Badger Culls

When are we going to find out if the badger culls have cut TB in cattle?

As part of the government’s 25-year strategy to eradicate TB, farming minister George Eustice visited the West Country to launch a new cross-industry TB biosecurity campaign which includes the introduction of the TB Hub (www.tbhub.co.uk), a website providing beef and dairy farmers with a range of free advice.

But he was unable to answer my question.
 
The website has been created by the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) in conjunction with the Animal and Plant Health Agency, the British Cattle Veterinary Association, Defra, Landex and the NFU, to provide information on all aspects of dealing with TB on farms.

Among the guidance is a five-point plan outlining measures farmers should take to help protect their herds from bovine TB. The plan includes the following common sense advice:

• Restrict contact between badgers and cattle 
• Manage cattle feed and water to reduce the chance of contamination by other infected cattle or badgers
• Stop infected cattle entering the herd by careful investigation of the TB history of purchased cattle and post movement testing of new cattle before introducing them in to the herd
• Reduce risk from neighbouring herds by awareness of their TB status and ensuring barriers between herds are kept in place
• Minimise risk of infection from cattle manure by ensuring all manure is well rotted and spread on land used for arable purposes or if spread on pasture the land is not grazed for at least two months.

The website expands on these points in detail and while some of the measures are more practical than others, the clear message is that although the government will continue the badger cull in certain areas, they also expect farmers to do their bit by heeding the biosecurity measures set out in this five-point plan. 

George Eustice was also asked about the effectiveness of this autumn’s badger culling programme in three areas of the West Country and although he said that we will have to wait for the official results to be announced it appeared he felt things had gone rather more successfully this year than in the previous two. 

However, what we really need to know is not how successful marksmen have been at killing badgers but whether the culling has had any impact on the occurrence of TB in cattle.  Although we have anecdotal evidence that it has helped, the government needs to carry out a proper analysis of the evidence which will help inform the decision whether the cull areas should be expanded.

James Stephen MRICS FAAV
Partner
Rural Practice Chartered Surveyor, Wells
T: 01749 683381
E: james.stephen@carterjonas.co.uk

The Badgers and Bovine TB issue

The Badgers and Bovine TB issue rumbles on with a recent debate in Westminster Hall where Farming Minister Jim Paice strongly defended the government’s proposal to introduce a trial culling programme of badgers.

Much of the debate surrounded the science behind the government’s proposals but Jim Paice responded knowledgeably stating that, “I do not believe that doing nothing should be an option”. He went on to explain in some detail that it is widely accepted that a badger cull as proposed would reduce the incidence of TB in cattle by 16% and explained further that the latest “science shows that the incidence of TB in the culling zones fell by up to 34%”

It seems to me the debate about the science will go on forever but what is also clear to me is that if we only try to control the disease in cattle and pay no attention to badgers which are known to be a source of infection in cattle then the incidence of TB in cattle will continue no matter how many cattle are tested and subsequently slaughtered. That is not to say that other avenues of research should not continue.

For instance an effective injectable vaccine has been developed for badgers although it is not practical to administer on a wide scale while an effective oral vaccine unfortunately appears to be many years away. As far as cattle are concerned an effective vaccine is thought not to be far away but there will then be major problems with the EU in getting agreement to use it.

So while the TB problem is getting worse both financially and geographically it seems the government’s proposals to introduce trial badger culls is coming nearer to fruition but it is also clear from Mr Paice’s statement that there will be a sting in the tail for the wider farming community in that the cattle testing regime is likely to become tighter. As Mr Paice stated in the debate, “We propose to reduce or abandon compensation where farmers are overdue a TB test.” So the bovine TB debate continues and although it appears this government is prepared to implement some form of control of badgers this will be accompanied by ever more stringent cattle testing and biosecurity measures on farm.

James Stephen MRICS FAAV
Partner
Rural Practice Chartered Surveyor, Wells