Don’t frighten the horses

Commercial property rarely makes for mainstream headline news and we’re thankful lfor that as we quietly get on minding our own and our clients’ business. We occasionally stick our head above the parapets at either end of the year with the annual round of reviews and forecasts but that’s about it.

At the outset of this year, commercial property professionals and pundits were in broad agreement that yields had most definitely peaked and that the volume of transactions we’d been enjoying were unsustainable and that total returns were set to fall – my own firm pegged the fall to 8.8 per cent. So far so predictable in Q1 and Q2 2016 then.

However, before the third quarter of the year had properly got underway, commercial property came crashing in to mainstream media headlines for five days in a row and not in a good way. I say ‘commercial property’ but what actually made the news was the suspension and closure of a number of funds which were invested in commercial property.

It was the funds that were falling down, commercial property is still standing. Alongside other property interests, thankfully. Expert property commentators and analysts were - and still are - at pains to point out that a commercial property fund is an investment vehicle and one not for the faint-hearted either. In the close world of any niche investment funds, it is easy for contagion and a herd mentaility to take hold.

Investors in all sorts of funds are getting spooked and some of those whose portfolios include commercial property funds are wanting to liquidise their investments and move on to other funds and other asset classes. Commercial property investment fund managers were left with little option but to suspend the funds while they sell the asset. It can take a long time to sell an office block, business park or a retail outlet, believe me.

The thought of Brexit has, understandably, made many people twitchy – just look at the pre-poll rock solid political careers it has ended but now some new careers have begun too. While the matter of the prime ministerial succession and the timescale has been settled earlier than first assumed, the financial markets reacted to uncertainty.

In those first weeks post-24 June along with the value of sterling falling, FTSE companies most exposed to UK business interests saw their share price drop more than those with more international exposure. There was much mention of housebuilders’ shares falling as if this was proof of a mass property Brexodus.

To make a connection between the closing of commercial property investment funds and a potential housing market crash á la 2009 is crass but some reporters whose business is not, ordinarily, the reporting of business can be forgiven in not appreciating the very clear distinction between commercial property and residential property.

Investors in the housing market in the UK are, in the main, those who live in their investment. The forces driving commercial property investment funds are very different from those governing the housing market, namely a fundamental shortage and a low interest rate environment in the case of the latter.

The economic and financial expert view is that whereas the credit crunch of 2008 and 2009 was a financial crisis with political ramifications, what we are experiencing now is quite the reverse.

Setting aside on what the actress Mrs Patrick Campbell was commenting when she said it, I am minded to agree with her when it comes to the present situation: “My dear, I don't care what they do, so long as they don't do it in the street and frighten the horses.”

Will Mooney MRICS
Partner
Commercial, Cambridge

Conscious uncoupling

Will Mooney, Carter Jonas partner and head of commercial and professional services in the eastern region “There is nothing permanent except change”, Heraclitus of Ephesus 535BC-475BC

I guess the works of the ancient philosophers have endured because they always seem to have a really good handle on modern life, don’t they? In mixing my ancient civilisations here, as the two-faced month named after the Roman god Janus ends, it seems to have rung in a mood of change – the mood which will surely go on to charactertise the rest of the year, as it does any year.

Divorce lawyers will confirm that January is good for business. It’s a month in which couples whose relationship has been rocky appear ready enough to confront the reality and initiate a change, whether permanent or temporary.

January this year saw Hollywood actor Gwyneth Paltrow admitting she regrets having used the phrase ‘conscious uncoupling’ when, last year, she announced that her and pop-star husband Chris Martin were divorcing. Yet, it’s an eloquent phrase impying, as it does, a grown up approach to unhitching in the way that ‘divorce’ has come to suggest something a bit more acrimonious.

In early January, the Swiss National Bank unhitched the Swiss Franc from the Euro. The following week Denmark was tipped to do the same with its Krone in anticipation of the European Central Bank (ECB) announcing a programme of Euro quantitative easing (QE) to alleviate the debts of certain Eurozone countries. The ECB having finally convinced Germany of the advisability of QE in the face of mounting disquiet and political unrest, particularly in those bailed-out Eurozone countries.

It’s been the month in which the battle of the supermarkets played out badly for two grocers occupying the middle ground. A pincer movement from food retailers at the premium and budget ends of the trolley park saw Dalton Philips step down as chief executive of Morrisons. In the same month, the last boss but two of Tesco came out in public to criticise his own immediate successor who, himself, had already resigned in July 2014.

In an interesting aside, on the theme of coupling and uncoupling, I read that a Cambridgeshire couple are planning to have their wedding reception in the café of their local branch of Morrisons in Cambourne - circumstances meant it was a frequent venue during their courtship.

In the week leading up to Burns Night on 25 January, proposals which could ramp-up the next phase of Scotland’s devolved powers were published for consultation. This is part of the phased fallout from Scotland rejecting to consciously uncouple itself from the Union in September last year.

Surely the most frenzied activity to couple or uncouple on the UK dating scene this year will be pre and post-General Election on May 07th. The blue and yellow members of the coalition have already embarked upon a fast track separation in talking about the differences in the coalition in party terms where once it was the coalition consensus that mattered above all else. Let’s hope any powerbroking in the absence of a workable majority administration will once more see peace and harmony in the Rose Garden of Number 10 soon after polling day.

With polling pundits calling a hung parliament, it’s been over 40 years – 1974 - since there have been two General Elections in one year here. How the times have changed since then.

Will Mooney MRICS
Partner
Commercial, Cambridge

Splurge, purge and debt

Setting aside the peculiarity of making an Autumn Statement in early December, the dust has settled, for the time being, on the brouhaha which accompanied the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s latest diagnosis and prescription to remedy the financial ills of the nation.

The country is riddled with debt and it needs to be cured by short and mid-term pain for long term gain it seems.

It is politically acceptable to talk about the national debt again in a way it probably hasn’t been since the 1970s. Then, we were all about the Public Sector Borrowing Requirement and inflation, the 3-day week and the winter of discontent.

All the mainstream Westminster parties - and those aspiring to become so after the next election - are no longer embarrassed to mention the ‘D’ word again. And not only to talk about how indebted we are as a nation, but also to set out their stall as to how we can decrease this public debt.

It is okay to talk about repaying our debt, even if in repaying it what we actually mean is reducing the cost of servicing it.

In the fiscal year 2018-2019, implementation of the Government’s current programme will see us save £18 billion in interest payments. Borrowing is falling. Next year it will be £75.9 billion, falling from £91.3 billion this which, itself, has dropped from last year’s £97.5 billion.

We are aiming to be in the black to the tune of a £23 billion suplus in 2019-2020 but we are cautioned it could get messy in order for this to be achieved. Being in the black is a laudable business aim.

While it’s fine to talk about our national debt and how we can repay it, it’s still not fashionable to talk about our private debt in polite company as that’s even messier, but we have to start somewhere.

Tucked away in the detail and the in-depth coverage of the Chancellor’s statement was notice of our intention to pay back or, at least try to clear, the nation’s historical debts – some of which date back to the early 18th Century.

The refinancing of World War One debts in 1932 took the form of a bond replacing a gilt which was first issued in 1917. Now - well ,on 09 March 2015 to be precise - the British Government is set to redeem this bond which, in total with other war bonds since the penultimate year of the Great War, has cost £5.5 billion pounds in interest alone.

HM Treasury has made it known that it is the intention to repay, at the appropriate point, ‘legacy bonds’ which shored up borrowings against other expenses incurred during our nation’s history.

Some of these bonds and gilts financed the Napoleonic Wars, the setting up of the Bank of England and the clean-up when the South Sea Bubble burst and rocked the finances of the country in 1720.

Which, if any of these specific, perpetual debts are to be revisited have yet to be confirmed in detail but the fact that we, as a nation, are beginning to address our nationalised indebtedness tells the story of our times more than of those past.

Let’s hope we’ve eaten, drank and been merry in the past few weeks; for next May, we vote.

Will Mooney MRICS
Partner
Commercial, Cambridge

Our ping-pong recovery

It was exactly three years ago when I was advised that ‘being on the brink is the new normal’ for what, at the time, was the foreseeable future. In 2011, many weren’t willing to assign a specific number of years to ‘the foreseeable future’ but I think we can say that, three years on, we are back from the brink, economically.

Yet as many economic and financial commentators judge, the country is still in a strange state of being where one set of indicators suggesting positive news is offset by another giving a gloomier gloss to our recovery. Yes, the economy is growing but there will be a shortfall on the deficit above £100 billion by the end of this year.

One Eurozone economist recently characterised the UK’s growth as ‘the wrong type of growth’. Much like the seasonal ‘leaves on the line’, it’s probably the best explanation for the feed of ping-pong, back and forth, contradictory economic data this autumn and the balancing act those politicians charged with running the country are having to perform day-in and day-out as our recovery plays out.

Perhaps the bruising economic experience the UK has endured since 2008 has changed our perceptions of what amounts to recovery. Pre-crisis, debt-levels being 40 per cent of national output were considered high but now it’s 80 per cent which is the trigger point at which the credit rating agencies talk about withdrawing our triple AAA status.

The shortfall on the deficit by this year’s end would have been considered big in times past at 6-7 per cent of national output but it is not as big as it was at its 9-10 per cent peak in 2008/2009.

In October, published figures recorded that unemployment had fallen below the 2 million mark for the first time in six years. But in this current tax year of 2014/15, income tax receipts are up by just 0.1 per cent yet outlay on social benefit payments has gone down.

Wage inflation runs at just 1 per cent at this point in our recovery but the Bank of England is anticipating 3 per cent wage inflation by the end of next year and therefore tax receipts will be up.

It may feel like a heavy trudge through the recovery now but many analysts are convinced there is good news in the pipeline and, thankfully, the wisest market operators will always invest for the long term.

Before that, we have the General Election in May and all bets are off that the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s Autumn Statement – scheduled for early December – will be anything else but a necessary political and economic balancing act of ‘Austerity Lite’. There is likely to be further squeezing of public expenditure but the pinch will not be as nippingly sore as it was in the early years of this administration.

In this ping-pong recovery of ours – in which we are growing faster than Germany - whether it’s politics which is the foil to economics or vice versa, balancing is not an act: it is the reality.

Much as we did in 2011, we are going to have to accept this new reality of our recovery for the foreseeable future.

Will Mooney MRICS
Partner
Commercial, Cambridge